Duplication https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces79.html

The article https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces79.html

in Comments describes exactly the same twice in one image after another:

Comments
NOTE: later issues show smaller date letters and stars surrounding portrait.

How to understand if stars are small or big for 2002:

[image] https://en.numista.com/catalogue/images/57ca780ba0362.jpg
[image] https://en.numista.com/catalogue/images/5cf8d34c4ea13.jpg

There are 2 comments on exactly the same subject. It is not polite to push reader to read them both and to think, what is the difference between them, and why they both are here. One comment is enough.

How can the article be corrected?

The page looks fine to me.

The first image is a direct side-by-side comparison, showing a close-up section of the coins. The second image is a more analytical one, showing the full coins with the exact messurements of what to look for. So, if you cannot tell what you have from the first picture, you can move on to the second picture. Or, if you start at the second picture and want another example of what to look for, you can move on to the first.

Or, if you do not care about the images, you can skip them entirely.

Thank you very much for your explanation.
The theoretical questions of varieties already gave us the outcome: for variety should be observed by naked eye one must not expect from it differences tinier then 0.1 mm.
So now we know which image should be removed. It bears numbers which contradict the ability of human eye.